ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2026
Predicting health-related quality of life two years post-diagnosis across seven cancer types: using machine learning to identify vulnerable patients.
Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCancer survivors often experience long-term consequences affecting their Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). Sociodemographic factors, clinical characteristics, and health-related behaviours influence HRQoL, making some individuals vulnerable to adverse HRQoL. This study develops linear regression and machine learning models to predict HRQoL two-year post-diagnosis and to identify key vulnerability factors.
methodsThis longitudinal study included data of survivors of seven cancer types. Nineteen predictor variables were derived from questionnaires completed within three months post-diagnosis (baseline) from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Linear regression, random forest, XGBoost, neural network, and Support Vector Machine (SVM) regressors were employed to predict the EORTC QLQ-C30 summary score 1.5-2.5 years post-diagnosis. Permutation testing assessed vulnerability factors.
resultsThe analyses included 4,538 individuals. All models achieved similar R
conclusionsThe predictors used in this analysis explained only 30% of the variation in long-term HRQoL. Similar to previous studies predicting HRQoL in cancer, these predictors miss crucial information. Baseline functioning, comorbidities, cancer type and BMI appeared to be the key vulnerability factors. Future studies should prioritize accurate prediction of low HRQoL scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.