ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2026
Temporal patterns of total, animal and plant protein intakes of Australian adults: a latent class analysis.
Article in European journal of nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFew studies have investigated temporal protein patterns of different protein sources. This study aimed to describe temporal patterns of total, plant, and animal protein intake of Australian adults and examine their associations with sociodemographic and eating pattern characteristics.
methodsTotal, animal, and plant protein intakes were estimated from the Australian National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey 2011–12 dietary recall data (≥ 19 years; n = 6741). Separate latent class models were used to determine the patterns based on hourly intakes of total, animal, and plant protein. Pearson’s Chi-square test and one-way analysis of variance were used to examine the differences in characteristics between latent classes of the patterns.
resultsThree sex-stratified temporal patterns of total (T1-T3), animal (A1-A3), and plant (P1-P3) proteins were identified. Class 1 was characterised by higher probabilities of consuming protein at the typical Australian mealtime (e.g., at 18:00 h for A1), while Class 2 had higher probabilities of intake 1-h later (e.g., 19:00 h for A2). Class 3 was characterised by variable timing (e.g., 17:00 h or 20:00 h for A3). Adults in Class T1, A1, and P1 were older than other classes, whereas those in Class T2 and A2 had higher incomes (all p < 0.001). Adults in Class T3, A3, and P3 were younger and had lower total, animal, and plant protein intakes from meals (all p < 0.001) but higher intakes from snacks (p < 0.001), except for women’s animal protein.
conclusionThis study identified three temporal protein patterns, which varied by age, income, meal frequency, and protein intake at meals and snacks. Future research needs to examine whether these patterns have different health implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.