ArticleUrolithiasis2026
Integrative multi-layer genetic analysis identifies novel susceptibility genes for urolithiasis.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urolithiasis is a complex disease influenced by genetic and metabolic factors. Although genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified susceptibility loci, the causal genes and mechanisms remain unclear. This study aimed to identify genes whose genetically regulated expression contributes to urolithiasis risk and clarify their potential biological roles. We integrated two independent European-ancestry GWAS datasets with multi-tissue expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) data from genotype-tissue expression project (GTEx) V8. Cross-tissue and single-tissue transcriptome-wide association studies, conditional and joint analyses, gene-level association, and fine-mapping were applied to prioritize candidate genes. Mendelian randomization and Bayesian colocalization were used to assess causality and shared genetic signals. Functional networks were explored using GeneMANIA. Multi-layer analyses identified GCAT and UGT8 as independent causal genes. MR analyses confirmed significant causal effects, supported by colocalization (PPH4 > 0.80). GCAT regulates glycine metabolism and oxalate production, linking systemic metabolic status to urinary microenvironment, whereas UGT8 modulates glucuronidation in fibroblasts, influencing local metabolic conditions relevant to stone formation. This study establishes GCAT and UGT8 as causal genes for urolithiasis, providing mechanistic insight into glycine/oxalate metabolism and glucuronidation pathways. These findings expand understanding of genetic regulation in stone formation and highlight potential targets for preventive and therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41677905What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.