ArticleAdvances in anatomy, embryology, and cell biology2026
Labiaplasty: Mind the Gap-How the Female Genital Cosmetic Surgery Industry Has Exposed Gaps in Modern Medical Anatomy Education.
Article in Advances in anatomy, embryology, and cell biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anatomy is often considered to be a static discipline, but advances in radiological and surgical techniques regularly change structural viewpoints, and the modern anatomist teaches into an ever-changing socio-political context. This chapter focuses on specific challenges faced by the modern anatomist when teaching female genital anatomy in response to the increasing popularity of the female genital cosmetic surgery (FGCS) industry and the diversification of gender in contemporary society. A qualitative methodological approach was used to explore how female genital anatomy is represented in contemporary scientific literature, anatomical textbooks, and anatomy education. An evidence base for normal female genital anatomy was identified using 12 population-based studies that recorded genital dimensions and confirmed that a wide variation is normal. An analysis of 78 historic and contemporary anatomy texts mapped representations of female genital anatomy over time and confirmed that the spectrum of normal genital appearance is not acknowledged in English-language anatomy textbooks. A series of semi-structured interviews with Australian anatomists identified barriers and facilitators for teaching genital anatomy. Barriers included lack of connection to contemporary clinical practice, technical difficulty and time involved in updating presentations, the crowded curriculum, and personal reticence about teaching genital anatomy. Themes around inclusivity also emerged during the interviews, with anatomists reporting reluctance to experiment with inclusive terminology as another barrier to teaching genital anatomy. The binary language and singular structural arrangements traditionally contained in lectures and textbook chapters on "Female Genital Anatomy" are nowadays rendered exclusive and incomplete. It is imperative that the modern anatomist, when developing anatomy curricula and resources, considers the importance of teaching about anatomical variation and using inclusive language given that many contemporary societies are embracing nonbinary views of gender.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41677874What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.