ReviewAdvances in anatomy, embryology, and cell biology2026
Trends Versus Transformative Tools Within Anatomy Education: The Case for Ultrasound.
Review in Advances in anatomy, embryology, and cell biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultrasonography has increasingly been integrated into undergraduate medical education. Although its impact on the diagnosis of some pathologies and the safety of certain clinical procedures has been discussed and supported by the literature, its role in medical education is still controversial.Advocates argue the benefits of ultrasound in teaching 'living anatomy' and improving students' appreciation of the close anatomical relations as well as physical examination techniques. It was also linked to elements of the hidden curriculum, where the impact on students' professional formation was also explored. Furthermore, ultrasound technology has become an integral diagnostic tool in critical care and emergency medicine, which supports the early introduction into the medical curriculum.On the other hand, criticism of the evidence that supports the impact of ultrasound technology in anatomy education remains. Further concerns about the cost, faculty expertise and time constraints within the crowded medical curriculum, as well as the lack of clear educational guidelines, still exist.Incorporating ultrasound technology into anatomy education differs among institutions worldwide, especially with regard to the stage at which it is introduced, its level of content and its length. This chapter explores the integration of ultrasound into the anatomy curriculum from a pedagogical lens, discusses the challenges of integrating ultrasound into anatomy instruction sessions and suggests strategies to overcome these challenges. It finally discusses steps to integrate this imaging modality into the anatomy curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41677873What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.