Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41677789›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2026

Frequency Band Analysis of Multiple Stationary Time Series.

Connor K Brubaker, Jack P Manning, Jennifer M Yentes, Scott A Bruce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Connor K BrubakerDepartment of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Jack P ManningDepartment of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Jennifer M YentesDepartment of Kinesiology & Sport Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Scott A BruceDepartment of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.

Funding

Adaptive Frequency Band Estimation and AnalysisR01GM140476 · NIGMS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI BRUCE, SCOTT A · 2020 to 2023
$1.2M
National Science Foundation CDS&E-MSS-2152950NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM140476NIH HHS R01GM140476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The frequency-domain properties of biomedical signals offer valuable insights into health and functioning of underlying physiological systems. The power spectrum, which characterizes these properties, is often summarized by partitioning frequencies into standard bands and averaging power within bands. These summary measures are regularly used for analysis in practice, but are not guaranteed to optimally retain differences in power spectra across signals from different participants. We propose a data-adaptive method for identifying frequency band summary measures that preserve spectral variability within a population of interest. The method can also identify subpopulations with distinct power spectra and summary measures that best characterize local dynamics. Numerical selection criteria are developed to select a reasonable number of bands and subpopulations that best characterize overall dynamics. A genetic algorithm is designed to simultaneously identify subpopulations and their corresponding summary measures. The method is used to analyze stride interval series from patients with different neurological disorders, revealing distinct subpopulations and the need for subpopulation-dependent summary measures.

Indexed as

Signal Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsComputer SimulationGaitGenetic AlgorithmsHumansModels, Statisticalcluster validationgait variabilitygenetic algorithmmulti‐taper estimationspectral analysisstride interval

Identifiers

PMID41677789
PMCPMC12899379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.