ArticleCells2026
Form Meets Function: Fiber Architecture Directs Proliferation and Differentiation in Gingival Keratinocytes.
Article in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Precise control of keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation is critical for oral epithelial regeneration, yet the mechanobiological cues guiding these processes remain incompletely defined. Here, we systematically evaluated how electrospun polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds with defined fiber orientations (aligned vs. random) and diameters (600-800 nm, 1.2-1.7 µm, 2.0-2.5 µm) direct gingival keratinocyte fate. Using immortalized human gingival keratinocytes, we assessed cell and nuclear morphology, proliferation dynamics, differentiation marker expression, and the effects of basal keratin (KRT5/KRT14) knockdown. Quantitative morphological analysis revealed scaffold-dependent changes in cell shape: aligned medium-diameter fibers (with fiber diameters of 1.2-1.7 µm) induced pronounced cell and nuclear elongation, whereas random fibers (600-800 nm) promoted larger, more rounded cell and nuclear shapes. Time-resolved EdU assays indicated that aligned scaffolds supported sustained proliferation, whereas random scaffolds elicited a transient proliferative burst followed by a decline. Gene expression analysis (ddPCR) demonstrated that random scaffolds (especially 600-800 nm fibers) upregulated basal keratins (KRT5, KRT14) and early differentiation markers (KRT1, KRT10, KRT4, KRT13) relative to aligned scaffolds. At the protein level, differentiation markers involucrin (IVL) and filaggrin (FLG) were likewise elevated on random scaffolds, corroborating the mRNA findings. Functional KRT5/KRT14 knockdown experiments revealed scaffold-specific dependencies: cells on random scaffolds required these keratins for viability, whereas aligned cultures remained viable upon KRT5/14 loss. Furthermore, KRT5/14 depletion differentially altered downstream differentiation markers (IVL, KRT1) and mechanotransduction markers (LMNB1, YAP1) in a scaffold-dependent manner. Collectively, these findings establish fiber orientation and diameter as key design parameters for controlling keratinocyte fate. As a translational concept, layered scaffolds combining aligned and random fibers may enable spatially controlled proliferation and differentiation in engineered oral epithelia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.