Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41677606›Full record

ReviewCells2026

Does the B7-H3 Immune Checkpoint Have High Potential as a Therapeutic Target?

Marco Agostini, Pietro Traldi, Mahmoud Hamdan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marco AgostiniIstituto di Ricerca Pediatrica Città della Speranza, Corso Stati Uniti 4, 35100 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7578-1233
Pietro TraldiIstituto di Ricerca Pediatrica Città della Speranza, Corso Stati Uniti 4, 35100 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7568-3614
Mahmoud HamdanIstituto di Ricerca Pediatrica Città della Speranza, Corso Stati Uniti 4, 35100 Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

B7-H3 (CD276), a member of the B7 family of proteins, is known to play a key role in the progression of a number of cancers. This protein is selectively expressed in both tumor cells and immune cells within the tumor microenvironment. Various investigations, including a number of clinical trials, have reported high levels of expression of this protein in cancerous tissues compared to their healthy counterparts. This difference in expression attracted various research efforts to establish whether such a difference can be linked to the therapeutic potential of this molecule. It is worth noting that B7-H3 is not the only immune checkpoint expressed at different levels in cancerous and healthy cells. Therapeutic strategies, based on different levels of expression, have been tested with other checkpoints. To inhibit the expression of some checkpoints, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were developed. The introduction of these inhibitors for the treatment of some forms of advanced-stage tumors has been justly described as an important milestone in the landscape of immune therapy. Years after the launch of these inhibitors, numerous clinical trials revealed that these inhibitors benefit a narrow subset of patients suffering from advanced-stage tumors, while the majority of patients treated with these inhibitors either did not respond positively or simply did not respond at all (refractory patients). Other clinical trials showed that this form of treatment can provoke serious immune-related adverse events (irAEs). It is fair to state that changes in the expression level of a given protein in diseased tissue is an important parameter to take into account in the assessment of such a protein as a therapeutic target. However, the last ten years have demonstrated that taking the level of expression of a given checkpoint within a cancerous tissue is not sufficient to consider such expression a reliable predictive biomarker for the investigated disease. On the other hand, to establish a solid base for a given therapeutic strategy, these varying levels of expression have to be combined with a deep understanding of the biology of the molecule under investigation, as well as the identification and thorough analysis of the relevant signaling pathways, particularly those communicating with both the investigated molecule and the immune system. Recently, a number of pharmaceutical and biotechnology firms have suggested that B7-H3 is a highly promising therapeutic target for the development of immune therapeutics. In this review, we ask why hopes of better therapeutic performance are attached to this immune checkpoint. A partial answer to this question is provided through the careful consideration of the available data generated by various clinical trials. The contribution of mass spectrometry-based proteomics to this area of research is highlighted.

Indexed as

B7 AntigensImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsAnimalsHumansImmunotherapyTumor MicroenvironmentB7 AntigensCD276 protein, humanImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsB7-3H immune checkpointimmune cell inhibitors (ICIs)immune-related adverse eventsmass spectrometry-based proteomics

Identifiers

PMID41677606
PMCPMC12896737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.