ArticleCells2026
Irf5 Knockdown in Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophages Favors M1-to-M2 Transition.
Article in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of IRF5 as an immune regulator.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026Review
- Review
- Cyclodextrins as Modulators of Regulated Cell Death: Implications for Immunometabolism and Therapeutic Innovation.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The transcription factor IRF5 maintains macrophages in the pro-inflammatory M1 state. We assessed the effects of siRNA-mediated knockdown of Irf5 on murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDM) in M0, M1 and M2 states. Knockdown of Irf5 in M1 macrophages made them phenotypically similar to M2 macrophages, which was reflected in the decreased expression of the M1 marker iNOS, increased expression of the M2 marker CD206, increased mitochondrial content and respective morphological changes. Interestingly, the M2 phenotype was also affected by the reduction in Irf5. Using atomic force microscopy (AFM), we showed that Irf5 knockdown increases plasma membrane roughness, particularly in M2 macrophages. AFM-based stiffness measurements indicated that Irf5 knockdown altered macrophage elasticity, potentially influencing their functional behavior. Our data suggest a complex role of IRF5 in macrophage polarization, supporting its dual role as a transcriptional activator and repressor both in M1 and M2 states, and highlight the importance of IRF5 in the maintenance of metabolic and functional properties of macrophages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.