Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41677529›Full record

ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Memristor Synapse-A Device-Level Critical Review.

Sridhar Chandrasekaran, Yao-Feng Chang, Firman Mangasa Simanjuntak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sridhar ChandrasekaranMicro and Nano Devices Laboratory, School of Electronics Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai 600127, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4168-611X
Yao-Feng ChangMicroelectronics Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78758, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8943-9305
Firman Mangasa SimanjuntakSchool of Electronics & Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9508-5849

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The memristor has long been known as a nonvolatile memory technology alternative and has recently been explored for neuromorphic computing, owing to its capability to mimic the synaptic plasticity of the human brain. The architecture of a memristor synapse device allows ultra-high-density integration by internetworking with crossbar arrays, which benefits large-scale training and learning using advanced machine-learning algorithms. In this review, we present a statistical analysis of neuromorphic computing device publications from 2018 to 2025, focusing on various memristive systems. Furthermore, we provide a device-level perspective on biomimetic properties in hardware neural networks such as short-term plasticity (STP), long-term plasticity (LTP), spike timing-dependent plasticity (STDP), and spike rate-dependent plasticity (SRDP). Herein, we highlight the utilization of optoelectronic synapses based on 2D materials driven by a sequence of optical stimuli to mimic the plasticity of the human brain, further broadening the scope of memristor controllability by optical stimulation. We also highlight practical applications ranging from MNIST dataset recognition to hardware-based pattern recognition and explore future directions for memristor synapses in healthcare, including artificial cognitive retinal implants, vital organ interfaces, artificial vision systems, and physiological signal anomaly detection.

Indexed as

LTPmemristor synapseSRDPSTDPSTP

Identifiers

PMID41677529
PMCPMC12899887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.