ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Lennard-Jones Parameter Fitting for Gold/Water Interaction Based on Structural Analysis: A QM, MM, and QM/MM Study.
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The interaction between water and metallic interfaces is crucial in many fields, and accurate modeling requires good parametrizations using reference data. In classical molecular dynamics (MD), an important part of this interaction is described using the Lennard-Jones (LJ) potential. However, previously reported LJ parameters are not always optimal for capturing the metal/water interactions observed in ab initio descriptions such as density functional theory (DFT). Therefore, well-tailored LJ parameters are necessary to improve the description of water structuring metals in classical MD. The usual route for obtaining LJ parameters involves energetic analysis, where the energies of various structures are obtained via DFT calculations and then matched with the energies obtained using the LJ potentials by varying the sigma/epsilon parameters. Here, we show a different approach to fit LJ parameters for metal/water interactions, based on structural analysis. We report several classical MD simulations for gold/water, varying the sigma/epsilon parameters, comparing the resulting water structuring with that obtained using DFT. Additionally, we test these parameters in quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) MD simulations, where electrostatic interactions are enabled. Our results demonstrate that the proposed approach can improve the LJ parameters reported in the literature and potentially develop parameters for more complex systems where the water structure above metallic surfaces plays a significant role. Finally, within this proposed approach, the water density profile obtained in hybrid QM/MM calculations, where water is treated as MM at a substantially reduced cost, closely matches the description it would have if treated as QM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.