ArticleJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2026
Clinical and HIV Surveillance Data to Determine Care Status for People With HIV in Washington, DC.
Article in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe examined factors related to being out of care (OOC) or reentering care after clinic transfer among people with HIV in Washington, DC using clinical and linked surveillance data from the DC Department of Health (DC Health).
methodsUsing DC Cohort HIV care encounters and laboratory results, linked surveillance data, and chart review, we determined if participants were (1) engaged in care; (2) OOC; (3) died; (4) withdrew; (5) clinic-reported transfer; (6) surveillance-based transfer (using DC Health data); and (7) undetermined. Of the clinic-reported transfers, we used surveillance data to determine whether participants reentered care after transfer. We evaluated associations between participant characteristics, being OOC, and reentering care using logistic regression.
resultsWe evaluated 12,563 DC Cohort participants, 6557 (52.5%) were engaged in care, 748 (6.0%) OOC, 1893 (15.0%) clinic-reported transfers, 1692 (13.5%) surveillance-based transfers, 1418 (11.0%) died, 41 (0.3%) withdrew, and 214 (1.7%) were undetermined. Of clinic-reported transfers, 832 (44.0%) reentered care, with 80.9% achieving viral suppression (<200 copies/mL). In the adjusted analysis, females, older age, non-Hispanic Black race, longer time since HIV diagnosis, CD4 ≥ 500 cells/µL, former or never smoking, and public insurance were associated with being engaged in care. Similarly, non-Hispanic Black race, non-Hispanic White race, nonviral suppression, Ryan White clinic, former alcohol abuse, and temporary/unstable housing were associated with reentering care among the clinic-reported transfers, after adjusting for covariates.
conclusionsIndividual, clinical, and structural factors were associated with being OOC or care reentry. Targeted interventions addressing these factors may improve sustained HIV care and reduce transmission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.