Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41677193›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2026

Conceptualizing and measuring integration of telehealth and in-person services from the provider's perspective: development of the integration of telehealth and in-person services (ITIPS) survey.

Christopher Michael Shea, Sharita Renée Thomas, Saif Khairat, David McSwain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher Michael SheaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.
Sharita Renée ThomasDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9227-2761
Saif KhairatThe Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, The University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8992-2946
David McSwainUNC Health, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, United States.

Funding

SPROUT-CTSA Collaborative Telehealth Research NetworkU01TR002626 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHUO, JOHN, MCSWAIN, STEVEN D · 2019 to 2023
$3.6M
Center for Virtual Care Value and Excellence (ViVE). RC2TR004380 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Saif Khairat · 2023 to 2026
$3.0M
HHS U3GRH40003-01-03HRSA HHSNational Institutes of Health (NIH) National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) 1RC2TR004380-01National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) 1U01TR002626-01NCATS NIH HHS 1RC2TR004380-01NCATS NIH HHS 1U01TR002626-01NCATS NIH HHS RC2 TR004380NCATS NIH HHS U01 TR002626NIH HHSOffice for the Advancement of TelehealthOffice for the Advancement of Telehealth (OAT), Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Cooperative Agreement U3GRH40003-01-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHybrid in-person and telehealth work environments are now common among health care providers. When in-person and telehealth services are not well integrated, provider workload could increase, negatively affecting provider satisfaction and burnout and hindering implementation of interventions aimed at improving quality. A lack of measures of telehealth integration has hindered studies of such impacts. This article presents the Integration of Telehealth and In-Person Services (ITIPS) survey, developed to assess telehealth integration and its facilitators from the provider's perspective. The ITIPS survey represents a meaningful step toward measuring integration in hybrid healthcare environments, including indicators of the extent of telehealth integration and factors promoting telehealth integration. MATERIALS AND

methodsUsing an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design, this study included semi-structured interviews and a participant-driven, modified-Delphi survey development approach consisting of 2 rounds of Qualtrics surveys to obtain participant feedback. Some participants engaged in all phases, whereas others participated either in interviews or in the modified Delphi surveys.

resultsInterviews identified multiple indicators of telehealth integration related to decisions about the visit modality, provider and staff workflows, as well as influencing factors such as leadership priorities related to quality and access, physical space, scheduling systems, and staff support. Our study yielded a survey with 22 items measuring the extent of telehealth integration in a practice environment and 31 items assessing factors influencing the level of telehealth integration.

conclusionThis study presents the ITIPS survey, which has undergone assessments for content validity and is ready for psychometric assessment for additional types of validity.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelSystems IntegrationTelemedicineDelphi TechniqueDigital HealthHealth Care SurveysHumansInterviews as Topichybrid work environmentsintegrationsurvey developmenttelehealthworkflows

Identifiers

PMID41677193
PMCPMC13047921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.