Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41677001›Full record

ArticleGenetics and molecular biology2026

Global patterns, biases, and advances in phylogeographic and genetic structure studies in Drosophilidae (Insecta: Diptera).

Henrique R M Antoniolli, Maríndia Deprá, Lizandra Jaqueline Robe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics and molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Henrique R M AntoniolliUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Instituto de Biociências, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6747-3641
Maríndia DepráUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Instituto de Biociências, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4568-1869
Lizandra Jaqueline RobeUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8506-9143

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phylogeographic and genetic structure studies involving Drosophilids have clarified numerous processes that have shaped the evolution of biodiversity over time. In this review, we aim to (i) assess the main biases, gaps, and advances in the scientific literature on this topic; (ii) synthesize the major findings emerging from these studies; and (iii) identify congruencies and discrepancies in the phylogeographical histories of different species and regions. To achieve these goals, we conducted a comprehensive review of peer-reviewed literature on phylogeographic and genetic structure studies of Drosophilidae published between 1987 and 2024. After identifying and filtering relevant studies, we extracted and analyzed key information related to each topic. Overall, we have detected a straightforward predominance of studies involving species of the Drosophila genus, especially within the melanogaster, obscura, and repleta groups. Interestingly, most studies employed nuclear DNA markers, either alone or in combination with mitochondrial markers, and were conducted across more than one biogeographical region, primarily in the Palearctic and Nearctic. Thus, our synthesis underscores the importance of broader taxonomic sampling and increased attention to understudied regions to enhance our understanding of biodiversity dynamics in response to environmental changes at both local and global scales.

Identifiers

PMID41677001
PMCPMC12895237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.