Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41676967›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging and radiation oncology2026

Preoperative Radar Localisation of Impalpable Breast and Axillary Lesions: Initial Experience in an Australian Tertiary Centre.

Grace Carpenter, Coralie Simoni, Lucy Lu, Jacqueline Eskander, Tracy Liu, Jennifer Yuill, Sophie Nightingale, Margaret Nguyen, Joseph Paiva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Grace CarpenterDepartment of Medical Imaging, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2535-9606
Coralie SimoniDepartment of Medical Imaging, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4053-4690
Lucy LuDepartment of Breast Surgery, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7505-2555
Jacqueline EskanderDepartment of Breast Surgery, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5945-6745
Tracy LiuDepartment of Medical Imaging, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5958-8596
Jennifer YuillDepartment of Medical Imaging, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8134-1285
Sophie NightingaleDepartment of Breast Surgery, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1797-2629
Margaret NguyenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0347-3933
Joseph PaivaDepartment of Medical Imaging, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0889-8201

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionImage-guided radar localisation (RL) is a wire-free alternative to hookwire localisation (HWL) for preoperative localisation of impalpable breast and axillary lesions, with potential logistical and technical advantages. This study assesses clinical utility, accuracy of placement and surgical oncologic outcome metrics for RL using the SCOUT reflector compared to HWL after introduction in a tertiary Australian breast service.

methodsRetrospective comparative cohort analysis of consecutive RL with a contemporaneous historical HWL cohort of similar size (between January 2022 and March 2025) was performed. Key outcome markers included device migration, localisation procedure duration, retrieval issues, surgical margin status and breast malignancy re-excision rates.

results287 patients were included (RL n = 144; HWL n = 143). No significant device migration was seen with RL compared to HWL (0.0% vs. 4.2%; p = 0.04) and retrieval issues were less common (4.2% vs. 9.8%; p = 0.10). Excluding MRI placement, procedure duration was shorter with RL (23 min vs. 28 min; p < 0.01). Negative, close, and positive margins were similar and re-excision rates for breast malignancy comparable (12.5% RL vs 16.8% HWL, p = 0.42).

conclusionRL is a safe, accurate localisation technique, demonstrating significantly fewer migration issues and fewer retrieval issues than HWL, while maintaining equivalent surgical oncologic outcomes. It offers logistical benefits of placement at any time prior to surgery (including time-of-biopsy placement), optimisation of radiology and surgical workflows, and versatility of axillary node and MRI-guided placement and compatibility.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsRadarAdultAgedAustraliaAxillaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPreoperative CareRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care Centersaxillary surgerybreast conserving surgeryelectromagnetic localisationimage‐guided localisationwire‐free localisation

Identifiers

PMID41676967
PMCPMC13069500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.