Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41676954›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry letters2026

Comparing the Mechanical and Thermodynamic Definitions of Pressure in Ice Nucleation.

P Montero de Hijes, K Shi, C Vega, C Dellago

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

P Montero de HijesFaculty of Physics, University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8873-8445
K ShiDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York 14260, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0297-1746
C VegaDepartamento de Química Física, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2417-9645
C DellagoFaculty of Physics, University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9166-6235

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crystal nucleation studies using hard-sphere and Lennard-Jones models have shown that the actual (mechanical) pressure within the nucleus is lower than that in the surrounding liquid. Here, we use the mechanical route to obtain the pressure for an ice nucleus in supercooled water (TIP4P/Ice) at 1 bar and 247 K. From this pressure, we obtain the interfacial stress using a thermodynamic definition consistent with mechanical arguments. Moreover, we compare the mechanical pressure with the thermodynamic pressure of bulk ice at an equal chemical potential and the interfacial stress with the interfacial free energy. Furthermore, we investigate these properties on the basal plane. We find that unlike in hard-sphere and Lennard-Jones systems, mechanical and thermodynamic pressures agree for the nucleus, and the interfacial stress and free energy are comparable. However, the basal interface displays an interfacial stress nearly twice its interfacial free energy, suggesting that this agreement may be dependent on the system, underscoring the limitations of mechanical routes to solid-liquid interfacial free energies.

Identifiers

PMID41676954
PMCPMC12951574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.