Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41676946›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Heart Association2026

Recommendations in Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Post Resuscitation Care Via An International, Modified Delphi Approach.

Mark Dennis, Alexander Supady, Darryl Abrams, Jason Bartos, Jae-Seung Jung, Natalie Kruit, Steven Ling, Alex Rosenberg, Mark Sackley, Tommaso Scquizzato and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readConsensus StatementReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06552312 (ECPR Post Resuscitation Care an International Consensus Statement Via Modified Delphi Approach), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06552312 active not recruitingnot on this map

ECPR Post Resuscitation Care an International Consensus Statement Via Modified Delphi Approach

TypeobservationalSponsorSydney Local Health DistrictRan2024 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsCardiac ArrestArmsDelphi Questionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mark Dennis *Department of Cardiology Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1281-1324
Alexander Supady *Faculty of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care Medical Center-University of Freiburg Freiberg Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4056-3652
Darryl AbramsDivision of Pulmonary Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital New York NY USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9073-3897
Jason BartosCenter for Resuscitation Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School Minneapolis MN USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0113-5305
Jae-Seung JungDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Korea University Anam Hospital Seoul Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8848-4112
Natalie KruitDepartment of Cardiology Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney Australia.
Steven LingDepartment of Intensive Care Tuen Mun Hospital Hong Kong China.
Alex RosenbergHarefield Hospital Part of Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6580-725X
Mark SackleyRoyal Australian Navy (retired) Sydney NSW Australia.
Tommaso ScquizzatoDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1394-8402
Aidan BurrellAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia.
with the Critical CAre after Resuscitative Ecmo (CARES) Expert panel †

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe global adoption of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for cardiac arrest is accelerating, reflecting its potential to improve outcomes in select patient populations. Although research has increasingly focused on patient selection criteria, there remains a critical lack of evidence to guide best practices in post-ECPR resuscitation management. This study aimed to identify key knowledge gaps and develop consensus-based recommendations to inform clinical decision-making in the post-ECPR setting.

methodsAn international, multidisciplinary steering committee comprising 11 ECPR experts and 1 survivor conducted a targeted literature review to identify key domains and gaps in post-ECPR care. Experts were recruited based on field impact and snowball sampling. A modified Delphi process was used, comprising 3 survey rounds. Consensus was defined a priori as ≥70% agreement or disagreement on Likert-scale statements.

resultsA total of 53 experts were recruited, representing diverse health care professions, gender, and levels of clinical experience. Of these, 52 (98%) completed all 3 rounds of the Delphi process. Consensus was reached on 126 individual statements, which were synthesized into 42 summary position statements. These recommendations span key domains of post-ECPR care, including system-level considerations, hemodynamic targets and management strategies, ventilation and oxygenation protocols, anticoagulation practices, temperature regulation, complication mitigation, weaning approaches, and neuroprognostication.

conclusionsThis modified Delphi study, informed by a diverse international panel, resulted in 42 consensus-based position statements addressing key aspects of post-ECPR care. In the absence of robust empirical evidence, these expert-derived recommendations offer a valuable framework to support clinical decision-making and the development of standardized post-ECPR resuscitation protocols. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT06552312.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHeart ArrestClinical Decision-MakingDelphi TechniqueHumansObservational Studies as Topiccardiopulmonary resuscitationECMOECPRextracorporeal membrane oxygenationpost resuscitation

Identifiers

PMID41676946
PMCPMC13055803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.