ReviewJournal of the American Heart Association2026
Recommendations in Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Post Resuscitation Care Via An International, Modified Delphi Approach.
Review in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06552312 (ECPR Post Resuscitation Care an International Consensus Statement Via Modified Delphi Approach), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
ECPR Post Resuscitation Care an International Consensus Statement Via Modified Delphi Approach
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuroprognostication After Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: ECMO-Specific Challenges and a Multimodal Time-Sensitive Framework.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Refractory Cardiac Arrest: Current Evidence, Clinical Pathways and Future Directions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Navigating the Evidence Gap: Expert Consensus as a Bridge to Research in Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Adults.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Five Practical Considerations for the Management of Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest: Reflections from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest Focus Group.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe global adoption of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for cardiac arrest is accelerating, reflecting its potential to improve outcomes in select patient populations. Although research has increasingly focused on patient selection criteria, there remains a critical lack of evidence to guide best practices in post-ECPR resuscitation management. This study aimed to identify key knowledge gaps and develop consensus-based recommendations to inform clinical decision-making in the post-ECPR setting.
methodsAn international, multidisciplinary steering committee comprising 11 ECPR experts and 1 survivor conducted a targeted literature review to identify key domains and gaps in post-ECPR care. Experts were recruited based on field impact and snowball sampling. A modified Delphi process was used, comprising 3 survey rounds. Consensus was defined a priori as ≥70% agreement or disagreement on Likert-scale statements.
resultsA total of 53 experts were recruited, representing diverse health care professions, gender, and levels of clinical experience. Of these, 52 (98%) completed all 3 rounds of the Delphi process. Consensus was reached on 126 individual statements, which were synthesized into 42 summary position statements. These recommendations span key domains of post-ECPR care, including system-level considerations, hemodynamic targets and management strategies, ventilation and oxygenation protocols, anticoagulation practices, temperature regulation, complication mitigation, weaning approaches, and neuroprognostication.
conclusionsThis modified Delphi study, informed by a diverse international panel, resulted in 42 consensus-based position statements addressing key aspects of post-ECPR care. In the absence of robust empirical evidence, these expert-derived recommendations offer a valuable framework to support clinical decision-making and the development of standardized post-ECPR resuscitation protocols. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT06552312.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.