ArticleHaematologica2026
ICANS mitigation in high-risk elderly patients treated with CD28 co-stimulatory anti-CD19 CAR-T cells using a standardization protocol: a pilot study.
Article in Haematologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) has transformed the treatment of relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), with CD28-based products yielding rapid responses but higher rates of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). With axicabtagene-ciloleucel and brexucabtagene-autoleucel, overall and severe ICANS reach 78% and 35%, respectively. Older adults are vulnerable, yet mitigation strategies are still lacking. To address this critical gap, we aimed to develop and implement a standardized ICANS mitigation protocol for older adults receiving CD28-based anti- CD19 CAR-T. We conducted a single-arm prospective pilot study in patients ≥75 or ≥65 years with additional risk factor receiving CD28-based CAR-T. The protocol included levetiracetam and thiamine prophylaxis, early grade-based corticosteroids and anakinra for grade ≥3 and refractory ICANS, which was defined as no improvement within 24 hours. Endpoints were ICANS duration, refractoriness, response, and toxicity. Forty-five patients met eligibility criteria. Median age was 75 years (range: 65-86 years); 78% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) ≥2 and 42% had neurologic comorbidity. Grade ≥3 and refractory ICANS developed in 67% overall, with grade ≥3 in 31%, and refractory ICANS in 20%. Median ICANS duration was four days, which was shorter than previous cohorts. Disease and patients' characteristics did not predict ICANS metrics, excluding lactate dehydrogenase which showed a trend for severe ICANS (P=0.07). modified Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (mEASIX) and ICANS-Prognostic Scoring System (PSS) scores were not predictive and expansion was not compromised. Cumulative steroids associated with infections (P=0.002) and non-relapse mortality (P<0.0001). Sixmonth progression-free survival and overall survival were 46% and 59%, respectively. In this high-risk cohort, the ICANS mitigation protocol using anakinra in a graded approach (vs. prophylaxis or salvage therapy) and a pragmatic definition of refractory disease was associated with shorter ICANS duration, despite severe event rates. Steroid-related toxicity remains a concern, and future efforts should focus on steroid-sparing mitigation to optimize outcomes in older adults undergoing CAR-T.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.