ArticleJMA journal2026
The Importance of Continuous Monitoring in Identifying Bradycardia during Propranolol Treatment for Infantile Hemangiomas.
Article in JMA journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To clarify whether continuous-monitoring can detect bradycardia during propranolol treatment for infantile hemangioma (IH) and explore management practices for patients with bradycardia. Methods: This retrospective study with historic controls was conducted on children with IH aged 0-1 year admitted for propranolol treatment at the National Center for Child Health and Development between October 2016 and July 2023. Patients were divided into two groups based on the monitoring method, namely, the spot-measurement group (October 2016 to August 2018) and the continuous-monitoring group (September 2018 to July 2023). Bradycardia was defined as a heart rate of <90/min lasting for 20 minutes. Patient data included clinical characteristics, propranolol dosage, and adverse effects (bradycardia, hypotension, and hypoglycemia). Statistical analyses were performed using Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney Results: During the study period, 106 patients were admitted for propranolol therapy; 49 were in the spot-measurement group and 57 in the continuous-monitoring group. The frequency of bradycardia was significantly higher in the continuous-monitoring group than in the spot-measurement group (21% vs. 2%, p = 0.003). In the continuous-monitoring group, 2 of 12 patients with bradycardia were symptomatic. All patients experienced prompt resolution of symptoms with the reduction of propranolol dosage and had favorable outcomes for IH. Conclusions: Continuous-monitoring can detect bradycardia more effectively during propranolol treatment for IH than spot-measurement, and reducing the dosage of propranolol can lead to favorable outcomes for IH while minimizing the risk of bradycardia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.