Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41676844›Full record

ArticleJMA journal2026

Factors in Patient-Clinician Interactions That Influence the Decision-Making Process of Older Patients with Dementia.

Yoshihisa Hirakawa, Kaoruko Aita, Tami Saito, Reiko Ishiyama, Sanae Takanashi, Chiho Shimada, Hisayuki Miura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMA journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yoshihisa HirakawaDepartment of Health Research and Innovation, Aichi Comprehensive Health Science Center, Aichi, Japan.
Kaoruko AitaUniversity of Tokyo Graduate School of Humanities and Sociology, Tokyo, Japan.
Tami SaitoDepartment of Social Science, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi, Japan.
Reiko IshiyamaInternational University of Health and Welfare Graduate School of Development of Care and Network, Tokyo, Japan.
Sanae TakanashiKobe Women's University Graduate School of Nursing Doctoral Program, Kobe, Japan.
Chiho ShimadaFaculty of Humanities and Social Science, Saku University, Nagano, Japan.
Hisayuki MiuraClinical Research Center, Yushoukai Medical Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The importance of promoting the autonomy of people with dementia has been globally emphasized. Several studies have investigated factors that impede and facilitate their decision-making. However, few studies have explored these factors in light of their decision-making process. Therefore, this study aimed to determine factors in patient-clinician interactions that influence patient autonomy and participation in decision-making among Japanese patients with dementia. Methods: The authors adopted qualitative methods to understand the perceptions of health care professionals such as physicians, nurses, physical therapists, care managers, and social workers. Between January and March 2022, individual in-depth interviews were conducted online with 24 health care professionals with ample experience in primary palliative care for dementia. The topics were the support provided in patients' decision-making, the support provided to proxy decision-makers, and the efforts undertaken for building a relationship between patients and families or among multidisciplinary teams. All interviews were audio-recorded electronically and transcribed verbatim. These data were synthesized and analyzed using content analysis. Results: Four main themes were derived that captured the factors that influence the decision-making process of Japanese patients with dementia in patient-clinician interactions: rapport, decision-making capability, provision of explanation, and presentation of options. The findings highlighted the importance of building rapport with patients through communication in the early stages of dementia, improving patients' decision-making capability and protecting vulnerable patients who cannot make decisions independently, explaining each option's risks and benefits in a comprehensible manner, and presenting a wide range of options to patients in everyday decision-making. Conclusions: Overall, the themes were in accordance with the process of informed consent. The findings also showed that clinicians must understand the barriers to obtaining informed consent that arise from patients' cognitive impairment, decline, and fluctuations, in addition to cultural factors.

Indexed as

advance care planningautonomydecision-makingdementiaJapanolder patientspatient-clinician interactionrapport

Identifiers

PMID41676844
PMCPMC12888972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.