Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41676817›Full record

ReviewJMA journal2026

Artificial Intelligence in Cerebrovascular Imaging: A Targeted Review of Aneurysm Detection and Rupture Risk Prediction.

Duong Le

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMA journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Duong LeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral aneurysms are a potentially life-threatening vascular pathology that can lead to subarachnoid hemorrhage, a neurological emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality. Traditional imaging-based assessments (largely centered on aneurysm size, shape, and location) often fall short in accurately predicting rupture risk. This limitation highlights the need for more advanced, individualized diagnostic strategies. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have introduced powerful tools capable of transforming cerebrovascular imaging and aneurysm management. This narrative review synthesizes published studies on the application of AI in cerebrovascular imaging, focusing on its potential to aid in aneurysm detection and rupture risk prediction. It examines the evolving role of AI through three primary technological approaches: radiomics, machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL). Radiomics enables the extraction of quantitative features from imaging data, revealing patterns and morphological indicators that may not be visible to the human eye. ML models synthesize imaging, clinical, and hemodynamic data to predict rupture risk with greater precision than traditional scoring tools. DL techniques, particularly convolutional neural networks, automate aneurysm detection and interpretation directly from raw image data. What sets this review apart from previous literature is its integrative approach: rather than focusing narrowly on one AI technique or imaging modality, it unifies radiomics, ML, and DL under a single framework and evaluates their clinical applications across both detection and risk prediction. Furthermore, it emphasizes emerging solutions like hybrid modeling, explainable AI, and multimodal data fusion, which are critical for real-world clinical translation. However, current AI-based methods remain at the investigational stage and have not yet been validated clinically, experimentally, or against existing diagnostic standards. Importantly, this review situates AI methods relative to established clinical benchmarks, including radiologist interpretation and risk scores such as PHASES (Population, Hypertension, Age, Size of aneurysm, Earlier subarachnoid, Hypertension, Age, Size of aneurysm, Earlier subarachnoid hemorrhage, and Site of aneurysm) and hemorrhage, and Site of aneurysm) and ELAPSS ( (Earlier subarachnoid hemorrhage Earlier subarachnoid hemorrhage, Location of aneurysm, Age, Population, Size of aneurysm, and Shape of aneurysm), Location of aneurysm, Age, Population, Size of aneurysm, and Shape of aneurysm), and emphasizes that rigorous prospective validation is essential before widespread adoption. It also proposes practical implementation strategies, including decision support integration, standardization protocols, and federated learning to enable secure data collaboration. By addressing both technical innovation and translational challenges, this review offers a clinician-focused roadmap that advances the field beyond theoretical models toward personalized aneurysm care. In doing so, it aims to reduce rupture rates and improve patient outcomes through precision medicine powered by AI.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecerebral aneurysmdeep learningmachine learningmedical imagingneural networksradiomicsrupture risk prediction

Identifiers

PMID41676817
PMCPMC12889001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.