Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41676773›Full record

ArticleHepatobiliary surgery and nutrition2026

Adult living-donor liver transplantation without simultaneous splenectomy.

Nobuhisa Akamatsu, Kaito Fukuda, Yujiro Nishioka, Akinori Miyata, Akihiko Ichida, Yoshikuni Kawaguchi, Junichi Kaneko, Kiyoshi Hasegawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nobuhisa AkamatsuArtificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1603-5147
Kaito FukudaArtificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yujiro NishiokaArtificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Akinori MiyataArtificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Akihiko IchidaArtificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshikuni KawaguchiArtificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Junichi KanekoArtificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kiyoshi HasegawaArtificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8734-740X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The need for intraoperative inflow modulation, especially simultaneous splenectomy and shunt ligation, to improve graft survival and avoid small-for-size syndrome (SFSS), is debated. These two procedures, performed during living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in some centers, have conflicting effects on portal hemodynamics, and the advantages are unclear. We investigated the impact of graft size on recipient outcomes without simultaneous splenectomy and to identify factors associated with graft survival. Methods: Adult LDLT recipients (n=234) without simultaneous splenectomy at our center were investigated with reference to graft size. The cutoff graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) for small grafts was set at 0.7%. Results: Recipient outcomes did not differ significantly between the small-sized graft and the non-small-sized graft groups; In patients with GRWR ≥0.7%, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates were 93%, 91%, and 91%, respectively, while the patient survival rates were 92%, 91%, and 87%, respectively. In patients with GRWR <0.7%, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates were 92%, 92%, and 89%, respectively, and the patient survival rates were 87%, 85%, and 81%, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in graft survival (P=0.79) or patient survival (P=0.45). The platelet count and graft volume increased significantly and the portal venous flow and shunt/spleen size decreased significantly after LDLT, irrespective of graft size. Older donors (>45 years old) and size disproportion between the graft and spleen (<70%) were independent risk factors for graft failure. Recipients with both factors had significantly worse graft survival (P<0.001). Conclusions: The present results demonstrated that adult LDLT can be successfully performed without simultaneous splenectomy, however, splenectomy could be considered for cases with spleen-graft size disproportion and older donors.

Indexed as

Graft failureliving-donor liver transplantation (LDLT)portal inflow modulationsmall-for-size syndrome (SFSS)

Identifiers

PMID41676773
PMCPMC12887322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.