ArticleHepatobiliary surgery and nutrition2026
Postoperative outcomes in living donor liver transplant
Article in Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The incidence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and progression to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is increasing concomitantly with the obesity epidemic. MASH is now one of the leading reasons for liver transplant in the United States. As such, living donor liver transplant (LDLT) holds promise to provide these increasingly medically complex patients with timely access to transplantation. The goal of this study was to compare outcomes between LDLT and deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) in this patient population. Methods: We performed a retrospective study using United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research (UNOS/STAR) data from 2002 to June 2022 and compared liver transplant outcomes in patients with MASH who underwent LDLT with DDLT. Donor and recipient baseline characteristics, as well as postoperative outcomes including graft and patient survival were analyzed and compared between groups. Results: The proportion of LDLT recipients on dialysis was lower than the proportion of DDLT recipients (1.2% Conclusions: LDLT for patients with MASH allows this medically comorbid patient population safe access to transplantation at an earlier and less decompensated disease stage and lower MELD with improved survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.