ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Personalized whole-brain Ising models with heterogeneous nodes capture differences among brain regions.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple lines of research have studied how complex brain dynamics emerge from underlying connectivity by using Ising models as simplified neural mass models. However, limitations on parameter estimation have prevented their use with individual, high-resolution human neuroimaging data. Furthermore, most studies focus only on connectivity, ignoring node heterogeneity, even though real brain regions have different structural and dynamical properties. Here we present an improved approach to fitting Ising models to 360-region functional MRI data: derivation of an initial guess model from group data, optimization of simulation temperature, and two stages of Boltzmann learning, first with group data, then with individual data. Our implementation uses GPU acceleration to mitigate the high computational cost of this approach. We then analyze how data binarization threshold affects goodness-of-fit, the role of the external field in model behavior, consistency among models fitted to different scans of the same individual, and correlations between model parameters and features from structural MRI, including measures of myelination and cortical folding. We find that binarizing fMRI data at higher thresholds decreases correlation between model and data functional connectivity but increases the heterogeneity of node external fields and their correlations with structural features. A choice of threshold that achieves both goodness-of-fit and intrinsic heterogeneity of regions results in a model that better reflects the reality of the brain as a network of intrinsically heterogeneous nodes. By enabling personalized, biophysically interpretable modeling of structure-function mapping across the whole brain, this approach can aid understanding of individual differences in brain network organization and bridge the gap between the network-focused methodology of connectomics and the region-focused paradigm typical of translational research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.