ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
A Population Coupling Model Identifies Reduced Propagation from V1 to Higher Visual Areas During Locomotion.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Point process generalized linear models (GLMs) have been a major tool for studying coordinated activity across populations of neurons. These models typically quantify how the spiking of a single neuron depends on the past activity of other neurons at multiple time lags, and the resulting neuron-to-neuron interactions are then aggregated to obtain population-coupling effects. However, when neurons within the same population exhibit similar spiking patterns, explicitly modeling individual interactions can be redundant and can unnecessarily increase model complexity. In such cases, population-level formulations may offer a more efficient alternative. For example, biophysical population models often characterize circuit dynamics using the average firing rate across neurons within a population, and recent data-driven approaches have similarly demonstrated the utility of population-level statistics for capturing cross-population interactions. Motivated by this consideration, we reformulate the GLM framework to operate directly at the population level. The resulting model, which we call pop-GLM, provides a computationally efficient method for estimating coupling between populations. In a simulated dataset, we show that pop-GLM achieves greater sensitivity in detecting coupling effects and can account for trial-to-trial variation in stimulus drive, which would otherwise introduce bias. We also note that moving from single-neuron to population-level modeling requires a specific modification of the traditional GLM framework. We then apply pop-GLM to real data and find reduced functional connectivity from primary visual cortex (V1) to a higher visual area during locomotion, a change not detected by single-neuron GLMs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.