ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Distinct cortical excitability and connectivity profiles within the human SMA complex.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction and aim: Understanding brain functions increasingly relies on a network-based perspective, emphasizing interactions across distributed regions. High-order cognitive functions, like language and executive processes, engage such networks rather than isolated cortical areas, yet mapping their dynamics in humans remains challenging. The supplementary motor area (SMA) complex serves as a crucial hub, functioning as an interface between cognitive and sensorimotor processing. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) enables causal, time-resolved assessment of cortical excitability and connectivity with high temporal and spatial precision. Extending prior proof-of-concept work, this study aims to provide normative neurophysiological signatures of the SMA complex (pre-SMA and SMA). Methods: Twenty-one healthy subjects underwent a TMS-EEG session where six stimulation targets over the SMA complex (three in pre-SMA, one in the border between pre-SMA and SMA, two in SMA) were recorded. Global cortical excitability via global mean field power (GMFP) was computed over three time-windows (10-50, 50-100, and 100-200 ms) and compared across targets. Normalized power in different frequency bands (α, β1, β2, γ) and natural frequency (NF) were also computed and compared across stimulation sites. Then, we calculated tractography-derived connectivity metrics to examine corticothalamic projections from each stimulation site. Apparent fiber density (AFD)-derived connection strength quantified intra-axonal fibre volume along pathways to the whole thalamus, whereas fibre bundle capacity (FBC) assessed the aggregate intra-axonal cross-sectional area at pathway endpoints, providing an estimate of information transmission capacity to each of the 23 thalamic nuclei. Results: Cortical excitability and oscillatory properties varied significantly across TMS targets. A gradient in cortical excitability was observed, where anterior and middle portions of pre-SMA exhibited significantly lower GMFP in the early post-stimulus phase (i.e., 10-50 ms) than SMA portions; interestingly, these differences were clearly dampened in a later time-window (50-100 ms) and disappeared after this period. Furthermore, higher α and lower β2 power were observed in anterior pre-SMA than posterior pre-SMA portions. No differences were observed in NF. Crucially, we also observed significant differences in whole- and single-nuclei thalamic structural connectivity. Discussion: These findings provide direct human
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.