ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Critical assessment of intratumor and low-biomass microbiome using long-read sequencing.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The detection of low-biomass microbial DNA in human tissues is often confounded by contamination, as demonstrated in the debates over the existence of microbiomes in the placenta, brain, blood, and tumors. Here we show that genomic DNA fragment length serves as a discriminator: while genuine microbiome genomes have long genomic DNA fragments, contaminant DNA is typically short. Using germ-free mouse tissues with bacterial spike-ins and human cell lines, we developed a metric that normalizes microbial read length to host read length. Across multiple human tumor and normal tissues, we found genuine microbiome signals are largely limited to tissues with natural microbial exposure (e.g., gastrointestinal tract, cervix, vagina, skin), while other tissues (e.g. kidney, brain, blood, and placenta) showed no evidence of resident microbiome. These findings support DNA fragment length as a metric for quality controlling low-biomass microbiome profiling, clarifying the debates and strengthen future studies of resident microbiome in tissues.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.