ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Regenerative base editing enables deep lineage recording.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing the inference of single-cell phylogenies and population dynamics from CRISPR lineage recordings.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reconstructing the lineage histories of individual cells can reveal the dynamics of developmental and disease processes. In engineered recording systems, cells stochastically edit synthetic barcode sequences as they proliferate, creating distinct, heritable edit patterns that can be used to reconstruct the lineage trees relating individual cells in a manner analogous to phylogenetic reconstruction. However, recording depth is often limited by the kinetics of the editing process: the rate of editing declines exponentially over time for an array of independently editable targets, leading to most edits occurring in early generations. Here, we introduce the hypercascade, a regenerative molecular recording system that takes advantage of the predictability of A-to-G base editing to progressively create new target sites over time. The hypercascade packs 4 editable target sites in every 20 bp of sequence, enabling high density information storage. More importantly, the hypercascade's regenerative logic leads to an approximately constant rate of mutation accumulation over time. This in turn facilitates reconstruction of deep lineage relationships. We demonstrate this by reconstructing trees spanning 23 days of editing and approximately 17 generations after a single polyclonal engineering step. Finally, simulations show that the hypercascade has the potential to record chromatin state transition dynamics across multiple genomic loci in parallel. The hypercascade thus provides a flexible and broadly useful tool for molecular recording.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.