ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Circuit organization of the forelimb-related M2-to-M1 corticocortical pathway in the mouse.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Communication from secondary (M2, premotor) to primary (M1) motor cortex is implicated in forelimb motor control. We investigated the underlying synaptic circuits in this corticocortical pathway in male and female mice using cell-type-specific optogenetic-electrophysiology methods, focusing on identifying the cell-type-specific synaptic connections in the excitatory and feedforward inhibitory circuits impinging on cervically projecting M1 corticospinal neurons. In forelimb M1 brain slices, recordings from layer 5B corticospinal neurons during brief photostimulation of M2 axons showed strong monosynaptic excitatory currents that, although accompanied by potent feedforward inhibitory currents, were capable of evoking action potentials (APs) in most neurons. In contrast, responses in layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons were generally much weaker. Parvalbumin-expressing neurons (PV), particularly in deeper layers, showed direct excitation from M2 axons without feedforward inhibition, and could fire APs robustly. Somatostatin (SST) neurons received generally weak inputs, whereas VIP and Ndnf neurons received stronger excitation and inhibition from M2 axons. Corticospinal neurons received little or no local inhibition from Ndnf and VIP interneurons, but relatively strong soma-targeting PV and dendrite-targeting SST inhibitory inputs, as functionally imaged by laser-scanning synaptic input mapping ("sCRACM"). The domains of PV and SST inputs were partly overlapping around the corticospinal somata, but broader for PV and more vertical for SST inputs. Collectively, the results provide a working model for the cell-type-specific synaptic circuits of this "top-down" corticocortical pathway, organized around direct M2 excitation and PV-mediated inhibition of M1 corticospinal neurons.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.