Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41676528›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Predicting Post-Stroke Aphasia Speech Performance from Multimodal Data with Explainable Machine Learning.

Shreya Parchure, Arnav Gupta, Apoorva Kelkar, Leslie Vnenchak, Olufunsho Faseyitan, John D Medaglia, Denise Y Harvey, H Branch Coslett, Roy H Hamilton

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shreya ParchureUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA 19104.ORCID 0000-0002-2712-843X
Arnav GuptaUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA 19104.
Apoorva KelkarDrexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 19104.
Leslie VnenchakUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA 19104.
Olufunsho FaseyitanUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA 19104.
John D MedagliaDrexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 19104.ORCID 0000-0002-8372-0139
Denise Y HarveyUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA 19104.ORCID 0000-0002-4312-9512
H Branch CoslettUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA 19104.ORCID 0000-0002-7954-8698
Roy H HamiltonUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA 19104.ORCID 0000-0001-8400-0726

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM148377 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Michael Lee Atchison, LAWRENCE F BRASS · 2023 to 2026
$12.0M
Training Program in Neuroengineering and MedicineT32NS091006 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Brian Litt · 2015 to 2026
$4.1M
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Aphasia: Efficacy and Neural BasisR01DC016800 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI COSLETT, H BRANCH · 2018 to 2022
$3.3M
Brain Network based Language System Neuromodulation for AphasiaF30DC022503 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Shreya Yogesh Parchure · 2025 to 2026
$110k
NIDCD NIH HHS F30 DC022503NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016800NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM148377NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS091006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aphasia, an acquired language deficit, is the most common post-stroke focal cognitive impairment, and roughly 60% cases become chronic (duration >6 months). Aphasia therapies could be optimized if clinicians could make personalized predictions of how individual persons with aphasia (PWA) would be likely to perform on particular language tasks. However, current approaches relying on imaging, lesion volume, patient demographics, and clinical scores achieve less than 50% accuracy in predicting performance in PWA. Research algorithms using complex imaging and fMRI can make binary predictions about the presence or absence of aphasia but do not give more clinically relevant information. We aim to predict word-by-word speech accuracy in PWA to better enable personalized speech therapies. To be clinically informative, machine learning models developed for this purpose should use clinically available inputs, explain key features behind a prediction, and generalize to new PWA and previously unseen words. This study combines multimodal input features from clinical testing scores and structural MRI neuroimaging with a novel data source: word-by-word linguistic difficulty. We computed metrics of cognitive burden, such as semantic selection and recall demands, and articulatory burden, such as word length in phonemes and syllables, using naturalistic corpora containing over a billion words of English text. Retrospective training, ten-fold cross validation and 500-run bootstrapping of different machine learning models with various combinations of input features was conducted using 4620 trials. A simplified version of the best model using widely available inputs was deployed clinically through a web app, and prospective generalization was tested on 570 trials with unseen words and different naming tasks in new PWA. We found the best performances with random forest classifiers using linguistic difficulty combined with either clinical information (AUROC ± SEM = 0.87 ± 0.07), or all together with structural imaging connectivity (0.90 ± 0.04). Classifiers using multimodal inputs significantly outperformed others employing single inputs (range 0.66-0.85, p<0.05). Extracting feature importances from the best model showed that Western Aphasia Battery scores, semantic demands, number of phonemes, and syllables were predictive of PWA speech accuracy. Structural integrity in peri-lesional brain regions predicted better language performance whereas higher connectivity of select contralateral homotopes contributed to prediction of worse speech. Without the inclusion of MRI data, lesion volume was a key predictor of PWA speech as well. A simplified, clinically ready, explainable model (publicly available as AphasiaLENS web application) predicted PWA accuracy for any user-entered word, not restricted to a standardized battery. Its prospective generalization performance was not significantly different from the best model using full inputs (AUROC ranges 0.81-0.89, p>0.05 ). Thus, our research can help inform individualized treatment planning for PWA, while also suggesting research targets through better understanding of brain-behavior relationships.

Indexed as

aphasiadiffusion weighted MRIexplainable AIlinguisticsmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID41676528
PMCPMC12889690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.