ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
On the limit: Working memory capacity constrains learning of complex visuomotor mappings.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human sensorimotor adaptation critically depends on the ability to map sensory inputs onto motor outputs. While this process was once thought to rely primarily on cerebellar-dependent implicit recalibration, recent work has revealed that explicit, cognitive strategies, relying on working memory and executive function, play a substantial role. However, it remains unclear whether explicit strategies can scale to support learning of complex sensorimotor mappings. Here, we parametrically tested the capacity of explicit strategies to solve a complex visuomotor rotation task by varying the number of target- rotation pairings that participants had to acquire. In experiment 1, participants were tasked with learning four visuomotor mappings - well within working memory capacity, based on prior studies. We found that participants achieved near-perfect compensation, which was best explained by the retrieval of stored target-rotation associations, rather than by computationally demanding algorithmic strategies. In experiment 2, in an attempt to push beyond working memory capacity, participants were tasked with learning eight mappings. Unlike in experiment 1, here we found that participants failed to fully compensate for the rotations, reaching asymptotic performance of only ~50%, despite evidence of continued strategic engagement. This performance limit was fully predicted by a parameter-free working-memory model where performance is a mixture of a fixed number of stored target-rotation associations and random guessing. These findings reveal a cognitive "bandwidth limit" on the effectiveness of strategies for sensorimotor adaptation: when task complexity exceeds this limit, adaptation plateaus, defining a fundamental constraint on how far higher-order cognition can go to support learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.