Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41676421›Full record

ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2025

Incorporating lipoprotein(a) into patient care: the Polish landscape in light of national recommendations and the updated ESC/EAS guidelines.

Tomasz Saniewski, Jakub Michał Zimodro, Grzegorz Procyk, Olivia Wasilewska, Bartosz Mroczyk, Michał Lis, Maciej Banach, Aleksandra Gąsecka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tomasz SaniewskiFaculty of Medicine, Lazarski University, Warsaw, Poland.
Jakub Michał Zimodro1 Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
Grzegorz Procyk1 Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
Olivia WasilewskaClinical Department of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetology and Nephrology, Czerniakowski Hospital, Warsaw, Poland.
Bartosz MroczykClinical Department of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetology and Nephrology, Czerniakowski Hospital, Warsaw, Poland.
Michał LisFaculty of Medicine, Lazarski University, Warsaw, Poland.
Maciej BanachFaculty of Medicine, the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland.
Aleksandra Gąsecka1 Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is the leading cause of death in Poland. Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] constitutes an independent, causal risk factor for ASCVD and aortic valve stenosis. Elevated Lp(a) is found in approximately 20% of the Polish population. Lp(a) measurements have been recommended in all adult patients to improve cardiovascular risk stratification. As the testing rate remains insufficient, there is a need to facilitate the incorporation of Lp(a) into routine patient care. This clinically oriented review outlines (i) up-to-date evidence on the role of Lp(a) in cardiovascular diseases, (ii) recent real-world data on the characteristics of Polish patients with elevated Lp(a), and (iii) strategies for Lp(a) testing and management in light of the current national recommendations and the latest 2025 Focused Update of the 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidemias.

Indexed as

atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseasecardiovascular risklipid disorderslipoprotein(a)prevention

Identifiers

PMID41676421
PMCPMC12887967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.