SynthesisFrontiers in plant science2025
Changing research trends in seed responses to stresses: a bibliometric analysis over the last 50 years.
Synthesis in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Abiotic stresses (e.g., drought, salinity, heavy metals) intensified by global environmental changes threaten plant seed germination, seedling establishment, and population persistence. Elucidating the spatio-temporal dynamics and adaptive mechanisms of seed stress responses is critical for ecological conservation and stress-resistant crop breeding, yet long-term global and regional research trends lack systematic integration. Methods: A bibliometric analysis was conducted using CiteSpace v.6.4.R1 to process 15,627 literature records (9,042 from Web of Science; 6,585 from CNKI) spanning 1975-2024, focusing on publication dynamics, cooperation networks, intellectual base, research hotspots, and emerging frontiers. Results: Seed-stress research evolved through three stages (initial exploration, rapid growth, steady breakthrough), with WOS and CNKI seeing annual increases of 684 and 453 articles post-2020. China led in WOS publication volume, but cooperation networks showed low connectivity. International high-cited literature centered on salinity/oxidative stress (80% reviews), while domestic research focused on staple crop stress responses and practical indicators. Post-2020, international frontiers leaned toward nanomaterials and signal transduction, and domestic frontiers prioritized cadmium pollution control and germination regulation. Discussion: Global research presents a diverse, integrated landscape, while domestic research exhibits strong application orientation with relative fragmentation. Future research should integrate basic mechanisms with practical needs, strengthen interdisciplinary/international collaboration, and focus on combined stress adaptation and green regulatory technologies, providing theoretical and technical support for enhancing plant stress resistance and ecological security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.