ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
No-tillage combined with deficit irrigation improves canopy photosynthesis and water use efficiency to stabilize yield in intercropped maize.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Water scarcity and uneven distribution of irrigation resources are major challenges for sustaining maize production in arid agro-ecosystems. While intercropping and conservation tillage have been individually recognized for enhancing crop productivity and resource efficiency, their integrated effects with irrigation management remain poorly understood. The long-term field platform was launched in 2015, and the trial was conducted in the northwest region in 2024, we embedded a three-factor split-plot experiment to evaluate the combined impacts of tillage (no-tillage, NT; conventional tillage, CT), planting pattern (maize-pea intercropping, IM; sole maize, SM), and irrigation regime (low, I1; medium, I2; high, I3) on maize yield, canopy photosynthetic dynamics, water-use efficiency, and photosynthetic enzyme gene expression. Methods: No-tillage intercropping under medium irrigation (NTIMI2) consistently achieved the highest yield, exceeding CTIMI2 and NTSMI2 by 10.5% and 27.2%, respectively, mainly through increases in ear number and thousand-kernel weight. Canopylevel analyses revealed that NTIMI2 sustained higher leaf area index, leaf area duration, crop growth rate, and net assimilation rate during silking-filling, thereby extending the photosynthetic functional period. These physiological advantages translated into greater assimilate supply and efficient partitioning, supported biochemically by the upregulation of nadp-mdh and nadp-me expression during grain filling. Importantly, NTIMI2 optimized the yield-water relationship: water-use efficiency was maximized and comparable yields were maintained relative to high irrigation, but with reduced water input. Discussion: Our findings provide mechanistic evidence that coordinated tillage and irrigation strategies regulate canopy source-sink dynamics and enzyme-mediated carbon assimilation, thereby reconciling the trade-off between yield stability and water conservation. This study highlights no-tillage intercropping with medium irrigation as a scalable pathway toward climate-resilient and water-efficient maize production in arid regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.