Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41676374›Full record

ArticleQuantitative biology (Beijing, China)2024

Measuring drug similarity using drug-drug interactions.

Ji Lv, Guixia Liu, Yuan Ju, Houhou Huang, Ying Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative biology (Beijing, China), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Measuring drug similarity using drug-drug interactions.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ji LvCollege of Computer Science and Technology Jilin University Changchun China.
Guixia LiuCollege of Computer Science and Technology Jilin University Changchun China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3693-8979
Yuan JuSichuan University Library Sichuan University Chengdu China.
Houhou HuangCollege of Chemistry Jilin University Changchun China.
Ying SunDepartment of Respiratory Medicine The First Hospital of Jilin University Changchun China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combination therapy is a promising approach to address the challenge of antimicrobial resistance, and computational models have been proposed for predicting drug-drug interactions. Most existing models rely on drug similarity measures based on characteristics such as chemical structure and the mechanism of action. In this study, we focus on the network structure itself and propose a drug similarity measure based on drug-drug interaction networks. We explore the potential applications of this measure by combining it with unsupervised learning and semi-supervised learning approaches. In unsupervised learning, drugs can be grouped based on their interactions, leading to almost monochromatic group-group interactions. In addition, drugs within the same group tend to have similar mechanisms of action (MoA). In semi-supervised learning, the similarity measure can be utilized to construct affinity matrices, enabling the prediction of unknown drug-drug interactions. Our method exceeds existing approaches in terms of performance. Overall, our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness and practicability of the proposed similarity measure. On the one hand, when combined with clustering algorithms, it can be used for functional annotation of compounds with unknown MoA. On the other hand, when combined with semi-supervised graph learning, it enables the prediction of unknown drug-drug interactions.

Indexed as

clusteringdrug combinationsdrug–drug interactionsdrug similaritysemi‐supervised learningsynergy effect

Identifiers

PMID41676374
PMCPMC12806202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.