ArticleQuantitative biology (Beijing, China)2024
Measuring drug similarity using drug-drug interactions.
Article in Quantitative biology (Beijing, China), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Teaching artificial intelligence through drug-drug interaction clustering analysis: Integrating project-based learning and large language models.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- A comprehensive review of cluster methods for drug-drug interaction network.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026Review
- Advances in deep learning for antimicrobial research.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- VCTatDot and VCTatMLP: novel deep learning models with triadic attention embeddings for synergistic drug combination prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based drug-drug interaction prediction: a critical review of models, limitations, and data challenges.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Measuring drug similarity using drug-drug interactions.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Combination therapy is a promising approach to address the challenge of antimicrobial resistance, and computational models have been proposed for predicting drug-drug interactions. Most existing models rely on drug similarity measures based on characteristics such as chemical structure and the mechanism of action. In this study, we focus on the network structure itself and propose a drug similarity measure based on drug-drug interaction networks. We explore the potential applications of this measure by combining it with unsupervised learning and semi-supervised learning approaches. In unsupervised learning, drugs can be grouped based on their interactions, leading to almost monochromatic group-group interactions. In addition, drugs within the same group tend to have similar mechanisms of action (MoA). In semi-supervised learning, the similarity measure can be utilized to construct affinity matrices, enabling the prediction of unknown drug-drug interactions. Our method exceeds existing approaches in terms of performance. Overall, our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness and practicability of the proposed similarity measure. On the one hand, when combined with clustering algorithms, it can be used for functional annotation of compounds with unknown MoA. On the other hand, when combined with semi-supervised graph learning, it enables the prediction of unknown drug-drug interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.