Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41676367›Full record

ArticleQuantitative biology (Beijing, China)2024

A clinical trial termination prediction model based on denoising autoencoder and deep survival regression.

Huamei Qi, Wenhui Yang, Wenqin Zou, Yuxuan Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative biology (Beijing, China), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Huamei QiSchool of Electronic Information Central South University Changsha Hunan China.
Wenhui YangSchool of Electronic Information Central South University Changsha Hunan China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6235-2043
Wenqin ZouSchool of Computer Science and Engineering Central South University Changsha Hunan China.
Yuxuan HuSchool of Computer Science and Engineering Central South University Changsha Hunan China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective clinical trials are necessary for understanding medical advances but early termination of trials can result in unnecessary waste of resources. Survival models can be used to predict survival probabilities in such trials. However, survival data from clinical trials are sparse, and DeepSurv cannot accurately capture their effective features, making the models weak in generalization and decreasing their prediction accuracy. In this paper, we propose a survival prediction model for clinical trial completion based on the combination of denoising autoencoder (DAE) and DeepSurv models. The DAE is used to obtain a robust representation of features by breaking the loop of raw features after autoencoder training, and then the robust features are provided to DeepSurv as input for training. The clinical trial dataset for training the model was obtained from the ClinicalTrials.gov dataset. A study of clinical trial completion in pregnant women was conducted in response to the fact that many current clinical trials exclude pregnant women. The experimental results showed that the denoising autoencoder and deep survival regression (DAE-DSR) model was able to extract meaningful and robust features for survival analysis; the C-index of the training and test datasets were 0.74 and 0.75 respectively. Compared with the Cox proportional hazards model and DeepSurv model, the survival analysis curves obtained by using DAE-DSR model had more prominent features, and the model was more robust and performed better in actual prediction.

Indexed as

clinical trialsDeepSurvdenoising autoencoderexperimental terminationsurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID41676367
PMCPMC12806306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.