Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41676329›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2025

Vision toolkit part 3. Scanpaths and derived representations for gaze behavior characterization: a review.

Quentin Laborde, Axel Roques, Allan Armougum, Nicolas Vayatis, Ioannis Bargiotas, Laurent Oudre

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Quentin LabordeUniversité Paris Saclay, Université Paris Cité, ENS Paris Saclay, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Centre Borelli, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Axel RoquesUniversité Paris Saclay, Université Paris Cité, ENS Paris Saclay, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Centre Borelli, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Allan ArmougumTechnologies Department, Innovation and Research, SNCF, Saint Denis, France.
Nicolas VayatisUniversité Paris Saclay, Université Paris Cité, ENS Paris Saclay, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Centre Borelli, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Ioannis BargiotasInria, CIAMS, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Laurent OudreUniversité Paris Saclay, Université Paris Cité, ENS Paris Saclay, CNRS, SSA, INSERM, Centre Borelli, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scanpath analysis provides a powerful window into visual behavior by jointly capturing the spatial organization and temporal dynamics of gaze. By linking perception, cognition, and oculomotor control, scanpaths offer rich insights into how individuals explore visual scenes and accomplish task goals. Despite decades of research, however, the field remains methodologically fragmented, with a wide diversity of representations and comparison metrics that complicate interpretation and methodological choice. This article reviews computational approaches for the characterization and comparison of scanpaths, with an explicit focus on their underlying assumptions, interpretability, and practical implications. We first survey representations and metrics designed to describe individual scanpaths, ranging from geometric descriptors and spatial density representations to more advanced approaches such as attention maps, recurrence quantification analysis, and symbolic string encodings that capture temporal regularities and structural patterns. We then review methods for comparing scanpaths across observers, stimuli, or tasks, including point-mapping metrics, elastic alignment techniques, string-edit distances, saliency-based measures, and hybrid approaches integrating spatial and temporal information. Across these methods, we highlight their respective strengths, limitations, and sensitivities to design choices such as discretization, spatial resolution, and temporal weighting. Rather than promoting a single optimal metric, this review emphasizes scanpath analysis as a family of complementary tools whose relevance depends on the research question and experimental context. Overall, this work aims to provide a unified conceptual framework to guide methodological selection, foster reproducibility, and support the meaningful interpretation of gaze dynamics across disciplines.

Indexed as

eye-trackingrecurrence quantification analysissaliency mapscanpathscanpath comparison

Identifiers

PMID41676329
PMCPMC12886041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.