ArticleAME case reports2026
Anesthesia and hemorrhagic stroke in pregnancy: case report and literature review.
Article in AME case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hemorrhagic stroke during pregnancy is a rare but life-threatening condition, commonly resulting from ruptured cerebrovascular malformations or aneurysms that lead to intracerebral or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). This case demonstrates favorable maternal and neonatal outcomes following rapid multidisciplinary coordination and timely delivery, adding valuable insight into decision-making in late-pregnancy intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Case Description: We report a case of a 39-year-old woman at 35 weeks of gestation who presented with sudden-onset neurological symptoms and was diagnosed with spontaneous ICH. On admission, a multidisciplinary team including obstetricians, anesthesiologists, and neurologists was involved. Due to the lesion's anatomical distribution, endovascular intervention was deemed unsuitable. An emergency cesarean section under general anesthesia was performed to optimize both maternal and fetal outcomes. Postoperatively, the patient was closely monitored, and both maternal and neonatal outcomes were favorable. Conclusions: Early recognition and an individualized, multidisciplinary approach are essential to improving outcomes for both mother and fetus. This case highlights that, in selected scenarios, prompt delivery combined with conservative neurocritical management can lead to successful results and contribute to the limited body of literature guiding care in such complex situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.