ArticleAME case reports2026
Tick-borne rash at the surgical site prior to lung cancer resection: a diagnostic and surgical dilemma case report.
Article in AME case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Managing emerging infectious exposures in the context of urgent surgical intervention, where standard guidelines may not provide direct answer, can be challenging. Case Description: We present a unique case involving a 69-year-old female patient undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for biopsy-confirmed adenocarcinoma of the right lower lobe (RLL). During preoperative preparation, a live Ixodes tick was found embedded in the patient's right flank, directly over the intended surgical site, accompanied by a large erythematous rash suggestive of erythema migrans. Despite the patient being asymptomatic of Lyme disease, this finding posed an important question of whether to delay a time-sensitive surgery or proceed through a potentially infected field. The tick was resected fully intact and sent to the path lab for analysis. In adherence with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines, and after infectious disease consultation, the surgical team proceeded with the surgery. The surgery and recovery proceeded uneventfully. Conclusions: This case illustrates a rare intersection of vector-borne illness and thoracic oncologic surgery. It demonstrates that timely surgery can safely proceed, in the appropriate context, after complete tick excision. The case also underscores the importance of preoperative skin examination in endemic regions and the need for clinical guidelines when unexpected, rare infections occur at surgical sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.