Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41676211›Full record

ArticleAME case reports2026

Tick-borne rash at the surgical site prior to lung cancer resection: a diagnostic and surgical dilemma case report.

Barkha Trivedi, Dominic Amara, Jeffrey B Velotta

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in AME case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Barkha TrivediUniversity of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Dominic AmaraDepartment of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jeffrey B VelottaDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Managing emerging infectious exposures in the context of urgent surgical intervention, where standard guidelines may not provide direct answer, can be challenging. Case Description: We present a unique case involving a 69-year-old female patient undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for biopsy-confirmed adenocarcinoma of the right lower lobe (RLL). During preoperative preparation, a live Ixodes tick was found embedded in the patient's right flank, directly over the intended surgical site, accompanied by a large erythematous rash suggestive of erythema migrans. Despite the patient being asymptomatic of Lyme disease, this finding posed an important question of whether to delay a time-sensitive surgery or proceed through a potentially infected field. The tick was resected fully intact and sent to the path lab for analysis. In adherence with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines, and after infectious disease consultation, the surgical team proceeded with the surgery. The surgery and recovery proceeded uneventfully. Conclusions: This case illustrates a rare intersection of vector-borne illness and thoracic oncologic surgery. It demonstrates that timely surgery can safely proceed, in the appropriate context, after complete tick excision. The case also underscores the importance of preoperative skin examination in endemic regions and the need for clinical guidelines when unexpected, rare infections occur at surgical sites.

Indexed as

case reportlung cancer resectionLyme diseasesurgical sitetick-borne rash

Identifiers

PMID41676211
PMCPMC12885821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.