ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model identify the lactylation-related protein SUSD3 as a prognostic and therapeutic biomarker for breast cancer.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated multi-omics, machine learning, network toxicology, and molecular docking reveal potential mechanisms underlying methyl 4-hydroxybenzoate-associated breast cancer.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Lactylation-mediated remodelling of the breast cancer microenvironment: single-cell multidimensional analysis and prognostic model construction.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent malignancies and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women. Lactylation, a recently recognized post-translational modification, has emerged as a significant factor in tumor biology, with increasing evidence linking it to cancer progression and immune modulation. However, the role of lactylation in tumorigenesis remains ambiguous. This raises questions about whether it serves as a primary driver or a secondary regulator during cancer development, as well as its influence on the tumor immune microenvironment and prognostic implications. Methods: This study investigates the clinical relevance of lactylation-related genes (LRGs) in breast cancer through a comprehensive analysis of extensive genomic datasets, including single-cell RNA sequencing, bulk transcriptomic data, and spatial transcriptomics from established public databases such as TISCH, TCGA, and GEO. Results: By using a combination of multiple machine-learning algorithms, we developed an effective lactylation-related signature that correlates with immune cell infiltration, chemokine expression, and tumor mutation burden. This signature proved useful in identifying breast cancer patients likely to respond to immunotherapy. Finally, we experimentally validated the quantified expression levels of hub genes in human breast samples and demonstrated the role of SUSD3. Conclusion: These findings indicate that our lactylation risk model can be used to predict the malignant progression and immune evasion of breast cancer. It is expected to become a potential therapeutic target and a diagnostic marker for breast cancer. This model also provides insights into breast cancer therapy and an effective framework for developing gene screening models applicable to other diseases and pathogenic mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.