Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41676091›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Healthcare educators' perspectives on IPE implementation at a Saudi university: a qualitative study.

Mohra Aladwani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mohra AladwaniDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Interprofessional education is one of the pedagogies recommended to help enhance the knowledge and skills of future healthcare workers. Educators are important stakeholders in IPE implementation. This study aimed to explore educators' views on IPE implementation at Taif University. Methods: Healthcare educators and leaders at the university participated in a qualitative study conducted between October 2024 and February 2025. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via Zoom. Data collection and analysis were guided by the SWOC framework (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and challenges). Thematic analysis was conducted to analyze the data. Results: A total of 21 educators from healthcare programs participated in the study. Educators with prior exposure to IPE, the location of some of the colleges, and the presence of a simulation center were perceived as strengths. Opportunities were identified in improving students' attitudes and skills within a collaborative work environment, and in enhancing collaboration with staff from various programs and clinicians from hospitals. Logistical barriers, staff resistance, bureaucratic approval processes, hierarchies, and lack of a university hospital were perceived as weaknesses and challenges that might hinder implementation efforts. Conclusion: This exploratory study provides insights into the views of educators and leaders about IPE implementation at Taif University. The overwhelming majority of participants had positive views on IPE integration into healthcare programs. Educators with prior exposure to IPE can advocate for IPE and help raise awareness of IPE among university staff and students. Decision-makers involved in implementing IPE can use these findings and make efforts to address the challenges and weaknesses identified.

Indexed as

educatorsfacultyhealthcare educationhigher educationinterprofessional education (IPE)Saudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID41676091
PMCPMC12888782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.