Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41676080›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of population data science2026

Cleaning and validating longitudinal maternal and child postcode histories from a national healthcare registry for environmental health research in London, UK.

Pia Hardelid, Glory Atilola, Amal Rammah, Bianca De Stavola, Tom Clemens, Steve Cunningham, Chris Dibben, Samantha Hajna, Alison Macfarlane, Ai Milojevic and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of population data science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Pia HardelidPopulation, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Glory AtilolaPopulation, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Amal RammahPopulation, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Bianca De StavolaPopulation, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Tom ClemensSchool of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Steve CunninghamCentre for Inflammation Research, Institute for Inflammation and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Chris DibbenSchool of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Samantha HajnaFaculty of Applied Health Sciences, Department of Health Sciences, Brock University, St Catharines, Canada.
Alison MacfarlaneCentre for Maternal and Child Health Research, City St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Ai MilojevicDepartment of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Jonathon TaylorFaculty of Built Environment, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Linda WijlaarsPopulation, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To create longitudinal postcode history datasets that allocate mothers to one postcode for each week of pregnancy and children to one postcode for each week of infancy for a study of air pollution and respiratory infections in infants. Datasets: We used linked birth registrations and NHS birth notifications for all children born in London between 2010 and 2014, which constituted the spine for the Air Pollution, housing and respiratory tract Infections in Children: National Birth Cohort Study (PICNIC) study. The birth data were linked by NHS England to the Personal Demographics Service (PDS) in order to derive maternal and child postcode histories for each week of pregnancy and infancy. Challenges: While the research team had extensive experience working with administrative data, including birth registrations and notifications, the postcode history data was a new resource and lacked meta-data, papers or reports from previous users. A substantial number of records were missing a move-in date, or both a move-in date and postcode, adding complexities when ascertaining an address history for study participants. Further, we encountered instances of incorrectly recorded postcodes and implausible numbers of postcodes recorded in a week. Lessons learned: One half of children in this London-based cohort moved during infancy, and one third of their mothers moved during pregnancy. This highlights the importance of taking into account changes in residential address in studies examining the association between environmental exposures and health outcomes. Cleaned and validated longitudinal national address records are crucial for environmental health studies. However, they are also resource intensive, with implications for researchers and research funders.

Indexed as

Environmental HealthRegistriesAir PollutionBirth CohortFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLondonLongitudinal StudiesPregnancyRespiratory Tract Infectionsaddressesenvironmental factorsinfant healthlinked longitudinal health recordsmaternal health

Identifiers

PMID41676080
PMCPMC12887630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.