ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2026
From microbiome collapse to recovery: a roadmap for microbiome-informed grassland restoration under global change.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Soil-Plant Coupling Principle (SPCP): A Conceptual Framework for Diagnosing Hidden Ecosystem Vulnerability.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Metagenomic Insights into Regional Differences in the Rhizosphere Microbial Communities ofMicroorganisms · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Grassland ecosystems depend on soil- and plant-associated microbiomes that regulate nutrient cycling, soil structure formation, plant health, and stress tolerance. This review synthesizes recent progress on how grassland microbiomes are assembled across rhizosphere, endosphere, and bulk soil niches, and how degradation drivers (e.g., overgrazing, drought, salinization, and nutrient enrichment) disrupt microbial diversity, network stability, and functional guilds, often shifting communities toward reduced mutualist capacity and greater disease risk. We then evaluate restoration strategies that aim to re-establish beneficial microbial functions through practices such as organic amendments, inoculation with mycorrhizae or plant growth-promoting microbes, and management approaches that promote habitat recovery and microbial recolonization. Despite rapid advances in sequencing and observational studies, major gaps remain: (i) limited causal evidence linking microbiome changes to process rates (e.g., nitrification, phosphorus mobilization) across field gradients; (ii) underrepresentation of soil viral ecology and its consequences for microbial regulation and ecosystem function; (iii) inconsistent persistence and context-dependence of introduced inoculants; and (iv) a lack of standardized, outcome-oriented indicators for "restoration-ready" microbiomes. Future research should integrate multi-omics with process-based measurements and long-term field experiments, develop locally adapted microbial consortia with monitoring of non-target effects, and strengthen risk assessment and governance frameworks to enable safe, scalable microbiome-informed grassland restoration under global change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.