ArticleQuantitative biology (Beijing, China)2024
Accurate cell type annotation for single-cell chromatin accessibility data via contrastive learning and reference guidance.
Article in Quantitative biology (Beijing, China), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Graph neural networks for single-cell omics data: a review of approaches and applications.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Pooled it
- MINGLE: a mutual information-based interpretable framework for automatic cell type annotation in single-cell chromatin accessibility data.Genome biology · 2025Article
- CASHeart: A database of single cells chromatin accessibility for the human heart.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2025Article
- annATAC: automatic cell type annotation for scATAC-seq data based on language model.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Accurate cell type annotation for single-cell chromatin accessibility data via contrastive learning and reference guidance.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in single-cell chromatin accessibility sequencing (scCAS) technologies have resulted in new insights into the characterization of epigenomic heterogeneity and have increased the need for automatic cell type annotation. However, existing automatic annotation methods for scCAS data fail to incorporate the reference data and neglect novel cell types, which only exist in a test set. Here, we propose RAINBOW, a reference-guided automatic annotation method based on the contrastive learning framework, which is capable of effectively identifying novel cell types in a test set. By utilizing contrastive learning and incorporating reference data, RAINBOW can effectively characterize the heterogeneity of cell types, thereby facilitating more accurate annotation. With extensive experiments on multiple scCAS datasets, we show the advantages of RAINBOW over state-of-the-art methods in known and novel cell type annotation. We also verify the effectiveness of incorporating reference data during the training process. In addition, we demonstrate the robustness of RAINBOW to data sparsity and number of cell types. Furthermore, RAINBOW provides superior performance in newly sequenced data and can reveal biological implication in downstream analyses. All the results demonstrate the superior performance of RAINBOW in cell type annotation for scCAS data. We anticipate that RAINBOW will offer essential guidance and great assistance in scCAS data analysis. The source codes are available at the GitHub website (BioX-NKU/RAINBOW).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.