ArticleAnalytical science advances2026
Electronic Smoking Devices Among University Students: Usage Patterns and Chemical Composition of Inhaled Substances.
Article in Analytical science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extractable and Leachable Studies on Electronic Nicotine Delivery System (ENDS) Components and E‑liquid Containers.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Electronic Smoking Devices Among University Students: Usage Patterns and Chemical Composition of Inhaled Substances.Analytical science advances · 2026Article
- Prevalence and factors associated with e-cigarette use among aspiring media professionals: A cross-sectional survey at a vocational college.Tobacco induced diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the prevalence of electronic smoking device (ESD) use and its associated behavioural and chemical risks among university students in Bahia, Brazil. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 355 students from public and private institutions through an online questionnaire between April and May 2023. Among participants, 25.6% reported having previously used ESDs, and 11% used them daily, with dual use alongside conventional cigarettes being the most common pattern (61.5%). Most users were male (57.1%), single (95.2%) and reported low levels of nicotine dependence. Curiosity, peer influence and flavour variety were the main motivations for use. In parallel, chemical profiling was performed on a commonly consumed e-liquid using DI-SPME-GC-MS and in situ-SPME-GC-MS techniques. A total of 223 compounds were identified in the e-liquid and 185 in the aerosol, including harmful substances, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), phthalic acids and fungicide dinocap. The samples were rich in terpenes, esters and solvents like glycerine and propylene glycol. The presence of toxic volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds highlights potential health risks, especially under repeated exposure. These findings reinforce the urgency of implementing regulatory policies and preventive strategies focused on ESD use in academic environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.