Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41675985›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2026

A Quantitative DNA Fiber Assay to Monitor Replication Fork Progression, Protection, and Restart.

Debanjali Bhattacharya, Ganesh Nagaraju

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Debanjali BhattacharyaDepartment of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
Ganesh NagarajuDepartment of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our genome is duplicated during every round of cell division through the process of DNA replication, but this fundamental process is subjected to various stresses arising from endogenous or exogenous sources. Thus, studying replication dynamics is crucial for understanding the mechanisms underlying genome duplication in physiological and replication stress conditions. Earlier, radioisotope-based autoradiography and density-labeling methods were used to study replication dynamics, which were limited in spatial resolution, representing only average estimates from many DNA samples. Here, we describe a DNA fiber assay that utilizes different thymidine analog incorporation, like 5-chloro-2'-deoxyuridine (CldU) and 5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine (IdU), into replicating DNA. Such labeled DNA can be stretched and fixed on silanized glass slides, which are denatured with mild acidic treatment to expose the labeled nascent DNA. This DNA can then be visualized by using primary antibodies against CldU and IdU, followed by fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies, and observing them using a fluorescence microscope. The DNA fiber assay allows the visualization of individually replicating DNA at a single-molecular resolution and is highly quantitative, high-throughput, and easily reproducible. This technique offers insights into different replication parameters, like rate of DNA synthesis, extent of reversed fork protection, restart of stalled forks, and fork asymmetry under untreated or replication stress conditions at a single-molecule level. Key features • Single-molecule resolution of DNA replication dynamics. • Diverse replication parameters can be quantified with variations of the labeling protocol. • Easily reproducible across different cell lines in any lab with a basic molecular biology setup. • Effective in studying the effects of different genotoxic treatments on replication.

Indexed as

DNA fiber assayFork asymmetryFork protectionFork restartFork speedReplicationReplication stress

Identifiers

PMID41675985
PMCPMC12887872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.