Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41675965›Full record

ReviewQuantitative biology (Beijing, China)2025

How error correction affects polymerase chain reaction deduplication: A survey based on unique molecular identifier datasets of short reads.

Pengyao Ping, Tian Lan, Shuquan Su, Wei Liu, Jinyan Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Quantitative biology (Beijing, China), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pengyao PingSchool of Computer Science Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology University of Technology Sydney Ultimo New South Wales Australia.
Tian LanSchool of Computer Science Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology University of Technology Sydney Ultimo New South Wales Australia.
Shuquan SuSchool of Computer Science Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology University of Technology Sydney Ultimo New South Wales Australia.
Wei LiuSchool of Computer Science Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology University of Technology Sydney Ultimo New South Wales Australia.
Jinyan LiData Science Institute University of Technology Sydney Ultimo New South Wales Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing data are widely utilised for various downstream applications in bioinformatics and numerous techniques have been developed for PCR-deduplication and error-correction to eliminate bias and errors introduced during the sequencing. This study first-time provides a joint overview of recent advances in PCR-deduplication and error-correction on short reads. In particular, we utilise UMI-based PCR-deduplication strategies and sequencing data to assess the performance of the solely-computational PCR-deduplication approaches and investigate how error correction affects the performance of PCR-deduplication. Our survey and comparative analysis reveal that the deduplicated reads generated by the solely-computational PCR-deduplication and error-correction methods exhibit substantial differences and divergence from the sets of reads obtained by the UMI-based deduplication methods. The existing solely-computational PCR-deduplication and error-correction tools can eliminate some errors but still leave hundreds of thousands of erroneous reads uncorrected. All the error-correction approaches raise thousands or more new sequences after correction which do not have any benefit to the PCR-deduplication process. Based on our findings, we discuss future research directions and make suggestions for improving existing computational approaches to enhance the quality of short-read sequencing data.

Indexed as

error correctionnext generation sequencing (NGS)PCR‐deduplicationpolymerase chain reaction (PCR) duplicatesunique molecular identifier (UMI)

Identifiers

PMID41675965
PMCPMC12806096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.