ArticleSaudi journal of medicine & medical sciences
Incidence of
Article in Saudi journal of medicine & medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: Observational studies that compared the prevalence of hematologic malignancies in liver transplant recipients with the general population were included following searches using relevant keywords in ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, with the overall quality converted into the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality standards (i.e., poor, fair, and good). The generic inverse variance method was used to pool the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) as risk ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: A total of 32 studies were included. Following liver transplantation, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder was the most common hematologic malignancy (SIR: 23.06, 95% CI: 4.08-130.04; Conclusion: This meta-analysis found that after liver transplantation, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is the most prevalent hematological malignancy. Although PTLD and other hematologic malignancies are less prevalent than solid organ nonlymphoid tumors, they significantly affect liver transplant recipient outcomes. Further research is necessary to identify strategies for managing these complications. Registration: PROSPERO (Reg. no.: CRD420251131279).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.