Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41675895›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026

Successful endoscopic resection of large duodenal bulb carcinoid tumor: a case report.

Mohamed S El Shahawy

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mohamed S El ShahawyDepartment of Internal Medicine, division of gastroenterology &endoscopy, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and importance: The best treatment strategy for intermediate size duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms (DNETs) measuring "10-20 mm," in terms of effectiveness, feasibility, and simplicity remains a grey area; however, endoscopic resection (ER) is increasingly conducted as an alternative of surgery on a case-by-case basis. Case presentation: We report a rare case of a 43-year-old female patient diagnosed at Almana general hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia, with a non-functional non-ampullary duodenal bulb neuroendocrine neoplasm (NAD-NETs) measuring 15 mm, which was discovered incidentally during an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Successful endoscopic mucosal resection was done without any local complication. The diagnosis was confirmed through immunohistochemistry. No local recurrence or distant metastasis was detected during early surveillance of the patient. Clinical discussion: Surgery has been the mainstream treatment of NAD-NETs for a long time. However, with continuous progress in endoscopic diagnosis and treatment expertise, the endoscopic treatment of NAD-NETs has gradually gained increasing interest. ER is reported to be effective and safe only for non-functioning duodenal lesions measuring <10 mm. The treatment of DNETs measuring "10-20 mm" remains controversial. ER might be considered only in selected cases and generally for tumors smaller than "15 mm." In view of our case report, ER could be the first treatment option in patients with NAD-NETs measuring "15 mm," without evidence of metastatic disease, and it might be a valid therapeutic alternative to surgical resection. Conclusion: Endoscopic mucosal resection may be a safe, effective, and feasible endoscopic technique for removing NAD-NETs measuring "15 mm" in size and might be a valid therapeutic alternative to invasive surgical resection.

Indexed as

carcinoid tumorendoscopic mucosal resectionupper GI endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID41675895
PMCPMC12889400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.