ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Successful endoscopic resection of large duodenal bulb carcinoid tumor: a case report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: The best treatment strategy for intermediate size duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms (DNETs) measuring "10-20 mm," in terms of effectiveness, feasibility, and simplicity remains a grey area; however, endoscopic resection (ER) is increasingly conducted as an alternative of surgery on a case-by-case basis. Case presentation: We report a rare case of a 43-year-old female patient diagnosed at Almana general hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia, with a non-functional non-ampullary duodenal bulb neuroendocrine neoplasm (NAD-NETs) measuring 15 mm, which was discovered incidentally during an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Successful endoscopic mucosal resection was done without any local complication. The diagnosis was confirmed through immunohistochemistry. No local recurrence or distant metastasis was detected during early surveillance of the patient. Clinical discussion: Surgery has been the mainstream treatment of NAD-NETs for a long time. However, with continuous progress in endoscopic diagnosis and treatment expertise, the endoscopic treatment of NAD-NETs has gradually gained increasing interest. ER is reported to be effective and safe only for non-functioning duodenal lesions measuring <10 mm. The treatment of DNETs measuring "10-20 mm" remains controversial. ER might be considered only in selected cases and generally for tumors smaller than "15 mm." In view of our case report, ER could be the first treatment option in patients with NAD-NETs measuring "15 mm," without evidence of metastatic disease, and it might be a valid therapeutic alternative to surgical resection. Conclusion: Endoscopic mucosal resection may be a safe, effective, and feasible endoscopic technique for removing NAD-NETs measuring "15 mm" in size and might be a valid therapeutic alternative to invasive surgical resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.