ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Corticosteroids as adjunctive therapy in acute meningitis: a narrative review.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute meningitis is a life-threatening neurological emergency with substantial global morbidity and mortality. Adjunctive corticosteroid therapy aims to mitigate the inflammatory response and improve clinical outcomes. Methods: We analyzed data from randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, Cochrane reviews, and international guidelines (e.g., WHO, IDSA, NICE), integrating findings from high-income and resource-limited settings. Key outcomes assessed include mortality, neurological sequelae (e.g., hearing loss, hydrocephalus), length of hospital stay, and treatment-related adverse events. Results: Corticosteroids significantly reduce mortality and neurological sequelae in acute bacterial meningitis (particularly pneumococcal), especially when administered before or with antibiotics. In tuberculous meningitis, steroids (dexamethasone or prednisolone) improve survival by 25%-30%, though long-term neurological outcomes remain inconsistent. In contrast, viral meningitis shows no clear benefit, and steroids are contraindicated in cryptococcal meningitis due to increased adverse events and worse outcomes. Limited evidence supports steroid use in parasitic meningitis (e.g., Conclusion: Adjunctive corticosteroids are a valuable intervention in specific forms of meningitis, particularly bacterial and tuberculous types, where they improve survival and reduce complications. Their use must be tailored to the etiology, timing, and patient population to avoid harm. Global and regional guidelines recommend dexamethasone as part of initial empiric therapy in suspected bacterial meningitis (excluding neonates), and in all cases of TB meningitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.